It’s Not a Perfect World: Leadership Practices that Grow Collective Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59719/txep.v9i1.62

Keywords:

Collaborative Leadership Team, collective teacher efficacy, distributed leadership, rural schools, school leadership practices, teacher mindset regarding parents

Abstract

Collective Teacher Efficacy (CTE) is one of the strongest known predictors of student achievement, yet many school leaders have limited exposure to the research or practical strategies needed to cultivate it. This descriptive study examined the leadership practices and organizational conditions that foster CTE in high-achieving elementary and intermediate schools in Northeast Texas. Although these campuses consistently exceed expectations, they contend with many of the same challenges as lower-performing schools, including poverty, staffing limitations, and shifting student needs. By focusing on successful schools, this study offers transferable leadership strategies grounded in an asset-based perspective. Findings highlight four key leadership moves that supported the development and sustainability of CTE: being visibly present in instructional spaces, protecting structured collaboration time, elevating teacher voice, and intentionally developing a collaborative leadership team. These leadership practices reflect the principles of Distributed Leadership Theory, Social Cognitive Theory, and Organizational Learning Theory, and align with recent mentoring models that emphasize relational trust and teacher agency. This culture of trust and agency extended to the teachers’ mindset in schools with high CTE. Teachers expressed deep respect for parents, including those unable to participate regularly in school activities due to demanding work schedules or single-parenting responsibilities, recognizing their commitment and value as partners in student success.  Implications for leadership preparation programs and practicing principals are discussed, offering practical guidance for cultivating CTE, even in the most challenging school contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, C. M., & Forsyth, P. B. (2006). The influence of trust on collective efficacy in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(6), 625-643. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230610704828

Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley.

Anderson et al. (2023). Collective teacher efficacy and its enabling conditions. AERA Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231175060

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.

Carpenter, D. (2018). School culture and leadership of professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(6), 1056-1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2014-0046

Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2025). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (7th ed.). Pearson.

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Dahlkamp, S., Peters, M. L., & Schumacher, G. (2017). Principal self-efficacy, school climate, and teacher retention: A multi-level analysis. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 63(4), 357-376. https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v63i4.56351

Donohoo, J. (2017). Collective efficacy: How educators’ beliefs impact student learning. Corwin.

Donohoo, J., Hattie, J., & Eells, R. (2018). The power of collective efficacy. Educational Leadership, 75(6), 40-44.

Donohoo, J., & Katz, S. (2020). Enabling conditions to support the development of collective teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Change, 21(3), 365-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09345-0

Eckert, J., Morgan, G., & Daughtrey, A. (2024). Collective school leadership and collective teacher efficacy through turbulence. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 23(4), 773-791. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2023.2239894

Eells, R. (2011). Meta-analysis of the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Loyola University Chicago. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/133/

Goddard, R. D. (2002). Collective efficacy scale. The Ohio State University.

Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and effect on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 37, 479-507. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037002479

Goddard, R. D., Goddard, Y. L., Kim, E. S., & Miller, R. J. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501-530. https://doi.org/10.1086/681925

Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037002479

Hallinger. P., & Bridges, E. M. (2007). A problem-based approach for management education. Springer.

Hattie, J. (2018). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hernandez, D. J. (2011). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Annie E. Casey Foundation. https://assets.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/AECF-DoubleJeopardy-2012-Full.pdf

Herrera, C., Torres-Vallejos, J., & Martínez-Libano, J. (2022). Psychometric properties of the Collective Efficacy Scale Short-Form in Chilean teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 935578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935578

Hesbol, K. A. Principal self-efficacy and learning organizations: Influencing school improvement. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 14(1). 33-51. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1218932.pdf

Karakose, T., Abdurrahman, K., Kanadli, S., Tulubas, T., & Yildirim, B. (2024). How collective efficacy mediates the association between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy: Findings from a meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) study. Behavioral Sciences, 14(85). 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020085

Lawrence, S. C., & Ray, T. R. (2024). Leveraging resources for relational agency: A comprehensive mentoring model for cultivating teacher agency. Texas Study of Secondary Education Journal, 33(2), 37–41.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2019). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 39(1), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Showalter, D., Hartman, S. L., Eppley, K., Johnson, J. & Klein, R. (2023). Why rural matters 2023: Centering equity and opportunity. National Rural Education Association. https://www.nrea.net/why-rural-matters

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 189-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15700760490503706

Texas Education Agency. (n.d.). STAAR performance standards: Performance level categories. https://tea.texas.gov/student-assessment/student-assessment-results/staar-performance-standards#:~:text=are%20as%20follows%3A-,Masters%20Grade%20Level,little%20or%20no%20academic%20intervention.

Voelkel, R. H., Jr., Prusak, K. J., & Van Tassell, F. (2024). Effective principal leadership behaviors that enhance teacher collective efficacy. Education Sciences, 14(4), 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040431

Published

2025-09-05

How to Cite

Lawrence, S. C., Ray, T. G., & Dudley, T. (2025). It’s Not a Perfect World: Leadership Practices that Grow Collective Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement. Texas Educator Preparation, 9(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.59719/txep.v9i1.62